02/09/2026
BREAKING: Decision on controversial Blackpool rock groynes deferred following fierce backlash
A planned decision to install massive rock groynes along Blackpool’s coastline has been officially deferred, following mounting pressure from coastal safety groups and political opponents.
The proposed groynes—intended to curb beach erosion and safeguard coastal infrastructure—sparked serious safety concerns from the local RNLI, who warned the physical structures could severely impact water rescue operations and beach safety. The local Reform UK branch has also strongly opposed the project, arguing against the visual and operational disruption to Blackpool's shoreline.
Blackpool Labour Defends "Only Viable Option"
In a formal statement addressing the pause, Blackpool Labour acknowledged public and operational unease but insisted the groynes remain essential to avoid catastrophic flood damage:
"We chose to defer the planning decision on the rock groynes. We have been working with the RNLI and understand the concerns they have raised. We will continue to meet with them and explore every possible mitigation.
Nobody wants rock groynes on our beaches. We have thoroughly examined the alternatives with specialist coastal engineers, consultants and the Environment Agency, and it is clear, Rock Groynes are the only viable option if we are serious about protecting properties from flooding.
Sand levels are falling, exposing the soft boulder clay beneath, which is eroding rapidly. If we do nothing, that erosion will undermine our existing sea defences and put homes and businesses at increasing risk.
This is about protecting our coastline and protecting people’s homes. We will continue to look at whether the design can be adapted further to reduce risks, but we cannot simply ignore the very real threat of coastal erosion and flooding."
What’s Next?
The council is set to hold further rounds of technical reviews with RNLI representatives and coastal engineers to explore modified layouts or additional mitigation measures before the planning application returns to committee.
With homes, businesses, and seasonal footfall hanging in the balance, finding common ground between flood resilience and water safety remains a delicate tightrope.
What do you think? Should sea defence take absolute priority to protect homes and businesses, or do the RNLI's safety warnings mean planners must go back to the drawing board? Have your say below.
